By Emily Margosian, assistant editor
“We are clearly past the ‘golden age’ where, by and large, physicians experienced something of a monopoly on the knowledge of medicine,” said Peter Lio, MD, a dermatologist in private practice in Chicago and clinical assistant professor of dermatology and pediatrics at Northwestern University. Considered a niche market several decades ago, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), a term that broadly encompasses a wide range of practices including yoga, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), acupuncture, naturopathy, and beyond — has now become a billion-dollar global industry. “Twenty years ago, there wasn’t as much discourse surrounding this, but now social media information is shared more quickly and freely, and I think that has had a lot to do with the rise of public interest in complementary and integrative approaches,” said Raja Sivamani, MD, MS, AP, adjunct associate professor of clinical dermatology at University of California, Davis.
Dermatology has not remained untouched by this trend, with research suggesting that patients with skin disease are more likely to use CAM compared to the baseline population (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(1):1-16). As patients increasingly turn to natural and alternative solutions for their dermatologic needs, dermatologists may be more likely to find themselves on the defensive with a patient who has decided that topical steroids don’t fit their vision of wellness. “From ‘instant experts’ via the internet, to a panoply of different health care practitioners competing for the same patients, I think we have our work cut out for us more than ever before,” said Dr. Lio. “Fortunately, dermatologists remain an incredibly talented, passionate, and well-trained group who are uniquely suited to thrive in such a melee.”
This month, Dermatology World consults with five physicians — each with their own take on this burgeoning area in health care — to address:
-
The evolution and expansion of alternative medicine
-
Practical strategies for negotiating treatment plans with alternative-minded patients
-
What to watch for on the horizon, while keeping a focus on evidence-based care
The evolution and impact of alternative medicine
In order to understand how alternative medicine gained such a foothold in American culture, it’s necessary to look backward. Early signs of a major tone shift in the country’s consumption of health care appeared in 1976, when the American Medical Association (AMA) was sued by a chiropractor for antitrust violations. It was forced to change the language of its Principles of Medical Ethics, ultimately removing the phrase, “A physician should practice a method of healing founded on a scientific basis and he should not voluntarily associate professionally with anyone who violates this principle.” While the victory was at the time largely symbolic, the incident nevertheless foreshadowed a more intersectional future between physicians and alternative providers.
Roughly 20 years later in 1994, Congress would pass the DSHEA (Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act), which differentiated supplements from food and drugs — thereby absolving them from having to meet the pre-market efficacy and safety standards of drugs.
Since then, CAM has become widely adopted by the public, with approximately four in 10 adults using some form of it, according to NIH survey data. This has created a steady cash flow for the CAM industry, with an estimated $30.2 billion spent out-of-pocket in 2016 — $12.8 billion of which was spent on supplements alone, as per a 2016 NIH report. Fueled in part by broad endorsement by both A-list celebrities and social media influencers (actress Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop “wellness” empire was recently valued at $250 million as per the New York Times), patients’ appetites for alternative health care are projected to further expand. Market research firm Grand View Research estimates that by 2025 the global market for CAM will reach a collective value of $196.9 billion.
Furthermore, data from the CDC indicates that one-third of adults (33.2%) reported using some form of CAM in the previous 12 months, and the number of annual visits to alternative providers has been estimated at 629 million — higher than the number of yearly primary care visits (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(1):1-16).
Who are the primary users of CAM? CDC data reveal that women are more likely to use CAM than men, as are persons with higher levels of education. CAM usage also varies according to race and ethnicity; “non-Hispanic whites have the highest reported usage at 37.9%, whereas non-Hispanic blacks (19.3%) and Hispanics (22%) had the lowest usage” (J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(1):1-16).
