By Ruth Carol, contributing writer
While patch testing has been the gold standard for diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) for a century, the key is combining the patient’s history and clinical examination with the results to determine the relevance of positive patch testing. That means asking the right questions, linking the answers to potential allergens, determining which patch tests are likely to yield the best results, having a good eye, and accurately interpreting the results. Once the offending allergens are identified, it requires educating the patient about how to avoid them. Those who do it well have earned the nickname the “rash whisperer.”
Standard patch tests and beyond
The commonly used patch tests are the Thin-Layer Rapid Use Epicutaneous Test (T.R.U.E. Test), American Contact Dermatitis Society (ACDS) Core Allergen Series, and North American Contact Dermatitis Group (NACDG) Standard Series. The T.R.U.E. Test consists of 36 FDA-approved allergens, the ACDS series is a panel of 80 allergens, and the NACDG series is composed of 70 allergens.
“There are more than 15,000 allergens out there. You’re going to miss opportunities to diagnose ACD if you only test for 36,” said Bruce Brod, MD, co-director of the Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Program at Penn Dermatology and immediate past president of the ACDS. “On the other hand, the T.R.U.E. Test encompasses some of the more common allergens.” It is also commercially available, making it convenient and more cost effective for dermatologists who don’t house allergens for comprehensive patch testing, noted Jonathan Zippin, MD, PhD, vice chair of research and director of the Contact, Occupational, and Photodermatitis Service at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City.
While allergens in the T.R.U.E. Test do not change frequently, both the ACDS and NACDG series are routinely updated. The ACDS series is a real-world patch testing baseline series that is scaleable, Dr. Brod explained. A consensus group of dermatologists — of which Dr. Brod was a part — compiled suggested allergen groups organized in terms of prevalence that can be logically scaled up or down based on the needs of the patch tester and individuals being tested. The NACDG is a multi-center research group that developed a panel of allergens including some used to study relevance.
Oftentimes, larger panels are needed to comprehensively evaluate patients. Examples of advanced trays that can be ordered include series to detect allergens in corticosteroids, botanical extracts, hair dressing products, rubber, shoes, and textiles. Dermatologists should assess their needs and choose supplemental series based on what would most benefit their patients, Dr. Brod said. Customized panels can help identify exposures that differ based on patient population demographics and geographic distribution. He has a lot of consults for patients prior to having metal implants, so he has a panel for orthopedic metals. Because Dr. Brod sees a lot of health care workers with hand dermatitis, he put together a series of panels to identify allergens in rubber gloves. It is estimated that 21-34% of ACD diagnoses would be missed without testing for supplemental allergens through comprehensive patch testing, added Jenny Murase, MD, director of the Patch Test Clinic at the Palo Alto Foundation Medical Group, and member of the ACDS Board of Directors.
Pros and cons of patch testing
Patch testing, however, is not an exact science. It’s suggested that the T.R.U.E. Test detects 66% of allergens, noted Christen Mowad, MD, director of the Contact and Occupational Dermatitis Clinic at Geisinger Medical Center. With expanded patch testing, that number is more like 80%. Customized panels can raise those numbers even higher.
It’s a very time- and labor-intensive process, especially when patients bring in their own products for testing. Staff has to learn how to prepare the trays and the nurse spends a lot of time with patients on their intake questionnaires. In a private practice, staffing and training would be an issue as would the cost of the tests, not to mention the time it takes for each appointment. “For a private practitioner who sees one patient every 15 minutes, there is not enough time to figure out potential allergens,” Dr. Murase added.
Patch testing is also time consuming and inconvenient for patients, who must come for a visit when the patches are placed on their back, return in two days for a patch reading, and return in five to seven days after that for a final reading. Patients can be itchy and uncomfortable if they have a reaction. Furthermore, some insurance companies have started to limit the number of patches they will cover. Insurance won’t necessarily pay for an additional 70-plus allergens after the patient has already had a T.R.U.E. Test, leaving the patient with additional expenses.
Patch testing is, however, the only thing that leads to a cure for ACD. Topical steroids can relieve the symptoms, but that doesn’t do much good if the patient continues to come in contact with the allergen, Dr. Murase said. Sometimes patients blame the medication for not working when the problem is that they are allergic to the steroid — which can be identified through patch testing.
To date, no other type of test is on the horizon to replace patch testing. A lymphocyte transformation assay has been shown to detect a delayed metal hypersensitivity, but it’s not widely available or covered by insurance, Dr. Mowad stated. Perhaps down the line, genomic studies might predict which patients will be allergic to what allergens, Dr. Brod said.
Explaining what products the allergens might be found in and how to avoid them is as important as identifying them. To that end, ACDS members can access its Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP) designed to help patients identify personal care products that are free of the ingredients that may cause an allergic reaction. Each list generated is personalized for the patient and the CAMP app allows patients to access their list on their phone. The ACDS is developing a portal for patients and physicians that it hopes to launch in 2019 that will make educational materials and resources easily accessible to patients, said Dr. Murase, who serves on ACDS’s Board of Directors and is chair of the CAMP Optimization Task Force. Similarly, dermatologists can use SkinSAFE to generate a safe products list personalized for their patients, also available on an app. “Providing this type of information to patients is useful and empowering,” Dr. Murase said.