By Ruth Carol, contributing writer
There is a growing patient safety concern that is unrelated to a specific diagnosis, medication, procedure, or treatment, but it can impact all patients. If you have a personal electronic device or use an electronic health record (EHR) system, you are at risk. It’s called distracted doctoring.
The explosion of personal electronic devices coupled with the use of work-related technology, such as EHRs, computer tablets, and smartphones, not to mention beepers and pagers, have created the perfect storm for distraction. Spoiler alert: Multitasking only makes it worse.
Distraction is on the rise
Physicians are under greater pressure to do more with less time and fewer resources, said Steven Chinn, DPM, MS, MBA, administrative director, accreditation, regulations and quality management at Stanford Health Care, and clinical associate professor at Stanford School of Medicine. During shorter appointment times, they are required to diagnose and treat the patient while documenting everything they’ve done on the EHR. Studies suggest that distraction might be attributed to the volume of work that physicians must accomplish on a daily basis, he added. And it’s not just physicians; residents, nurses, pharmacists, and therapists are also impacted.
Distraction is a growing societal problem and health care is not immune to it, stated Jennifer Gardner, MD, assistant professor of medicine and dermatology at the University of Washington School of Medicine. “The only difference is that the stakes are higher in health care than in a lot of other realms of life, which is why it’s that much more important to address.”
Peter J. Papadakos, MD, author of Distracted Doctoring: Returning to Patient-Centered Care in the Digital Age, believes the pivotal event that brought this issue to the forefront in health care was the 2014 case of the Dallas anesthesiologist who was using his iPad during a procedure and failed to notice that his patient’s blood oxygen levels had dropped substantially until it was too late. The patient subsequently died. Organizations started questioning if their physicians were engaging in that type of behavior too, said the anesthesiologist who lectures around the country and internationally about distracted doctoring and how to interact with devices in the patient care setting. “I hear that errors are on the rise due to distraction at hospitals around the world,” he added.
Different than previous technologic advances, the recent onslaught of personal electronic devices has blurred the lines of work and home life, Dr. Gardner explained. “The perception is that we should be available 24/7 because we have the ability to respond to any issue any time of day via email and text — a perception promoted by employers,” she said. “That ‘always on’ mentality is underappreciated and draining our ability to focus.” Additionally, physicians are pressured to interact with their electronic devices to obtain medical information, review lab results and images, read patient notes, and document findings. Another difference is that in the past there was a physical barrier between people and technology, but today practically everyone carries their smartphone with them at all times.
While some believe that younger physicians are more susceptible to distraction because they have grown up being constantly connected with social media, others maintain that physicians of all ages are vulnerable. As proof of the former, Dr. Papadakos cited a 2012 study published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine in which smartphones were used during patient rounds by 85% of residents compared with only 48% of faculty. About 37% of residents compared with only 12% of faculty read and/or responded to personal texts/emails. Moreover, 19% of residents and 12% of attendings believed that they had missed important information due to distraction from smartphones. Residents are more adept at using this technology because it is part of their processes, Dr. Chinn said, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they are more vulnerable to distraction caused by it. Younger generations are not always aware of how connected they are, said Sarah Kasprowicz, MD, from Medical Dermatology Associates of Chicago, who relayed the story of a resident who took out her cell phone to respond to a personal text while in the room with a patient. When Dr. Kasprowicz later asked the resident if everything was okay and if she needed to leave to address a personal emergency, the resident wasn’t sure why the doctor was asking. “What the resident did is unacceptable on a number of levels,” Dr. Kasprowicz said. “But I don’t think she was even aware of her actions.”
Electronic devices are addictive
Chances are she probably wasn’t. “The tech world has hijacked our dopamine systems,” Dr. Gardner said. “That’s why we feel vulnerable when we don’t answer the cell phone or a text; the technology is working on a subconscious level.”
Dopamine causes people to engage in “seeking” and “wanting” behaviors, such as checking emails or social media. “We’re never quite sure when we’re going to receive a text message and from whom, so we keep checking,” said Shelley Rizzo, MSN, CPHRM, patient safety risk manager who presents across the nation about distracted doctoring for The Doctors Company, the nation’s largest physician-owned medical malpractice insurer. “When the device rings or vibrates, we know there’s a reward coming. Anticipation of the reward is sometimes better than the reward itself.” The instant gratification that one gets from receiving an email, text, or tweet encourages more seeking behavior. This is referred to as dopamine looping. Constant stimulation of the dopamine system, however, can be exhausting and cause lack of focus.
People typically use their devices right out of the box without adjusting their settings, Dr. Gardner said. “The devices are loaded with shiny, colorful flashing banners and notifications designed by tech developers to grab our attention, and it takes a lot more than will power to beat out this psychology,” she stated. To make matters worse, studies have shown that these devices can interfere with sleep. The blue light from cell phones and internet devices disrupts melatonin production, which can lead to insomnia and/or sleep deprivation.
Dr. Papadakos, director of critical care at the University of Rochester Medical Center, and his colleagues modified the CAGE substance abuse screening tool to help identify very high users of electronic devices who may benefit from getting additional help with preventing distraction from electronic devices in the operating room. During his lectures, he typically polls his audiences to determine whether they are addicted to electronic devices. “We have found that 50-75% of respondents, all of whom are health care professionals, are addicted,” Dr. Papadakos said.
Sources of distraction
“The smartphone is the most common distraction because it’s always with us whether it is used at work or not,” Dr. Gardner said. Just having it around is a distraction. “It’s playing on your mind because it makes you wonder, ‘What am I missing?’” she added.
The institutional reliance on email forces physicians to routinely check their smartphones, Dr. Papadakos noted. As a university-based physician, he receives more than 100 emails a day from the medical center, many of which he must respond to, despite their lack of urgency.
Next on the list is the EHR. Having all the patient’s health information in one place can be very helpful, Dr. Chinn said, but it also means that physicians have to filter through potentially thousands of entries to find information relevant to the patient’s current health issue. That can be very distracting and frustrating, he said. There is so much pressure to chart everything in the EHR that it inevitably feels like a distraction to the clinician and patient, Dr. Kasprowicz added.
None of the information in the EHR is prioritized; it just shows up, Dr. Gardner said. “You can’t look at all of the folders at once, so you have to scroll through them all.” Sometimes it takes scrolling through 30 charts to find the patient who should be seen right away. It’s assumed that if a patient calls that it’s a more urgent matter, but that’s not fool proof because younger patients tend to send email messages and they expect a quick response. This lack of prioritization creates an artificial sense of urgency and opportunities to miss truly emergent situations, she said.
Another significant source of distraction is not electronic. It’s the insurance hurdles that physicians and/or their staff must wade through. “What used to take a five-minute phone call now requires 80 emails to three different people,” Dr. Papadakos quipped. Nothing is more frustrating than to take the time to explain a treatment to a patient who can’t follow through because it’s not covered, the recommended referral doctor is out of network, or the medication is unaffordable, Dr. Chinn said. Ironically, this is one area where technology could pull its weight, Dr. Gardner said. If the EHR interfaced with insurance requirements, for example, the physician would know that the insurer prefers that an equivalent medication be prescribed or that the prescription must be sent to a specific pharmacy. “Then patients could get the medication they need when they need it and not to have to navigate the system themselves,” she said. “And it would eliminate a lot of back and forth between the insurance companies and physicians.”
Some institutions are developing e-etiquette programs and protocols. For example, Kaiser Permanente developed guidelines for clinician-patient communication (see sidebar), and UCLA Health System developed an educational video to demonstrate how to use computers while maintaining patient-centered care. Along those lines, when Dr. Kasprowicz is in the exam room, she positions herself so that she is focused in front of the patient. “Take the time to look up from the computer screen and make eye contact,” she said. “I often pause when I need to document a physical finding and I will tell the patient what I’m doing so the patient knows that the moment is about him or her.” To engage patients, best practices suggest that physicians should explain step-by-step what they are doing, Rizzo noted.