The pregnant pause in cutaneous lymphoma
By Jennifer Villasenor-Park, MD, FAAD
Oct. 2, 2024
Vol. 6, No. 40
Primary cutaneous lymphomas are a rare heterogenous group of non-Hodgkins lymphomas of which mycosis fungoides (MF) is the most common variant. While most patients are diagnosed between the ages of 55-60, a small percentage of patients are diagnosed at a younger age. (1,2) Diagnosing and treating female patients during their childbearing years presents unique challenges given the rarity of pregnancy-associated CTCL and limited options for pregnancy-safe treatment. Moreover, it is not clear whether the relatively immunosuppressive environment of the pregnant patient promotes progression of disease.
Few data exist regarding prognosis in pregnancy associated-CTCL and its effect on pregnancy and fetal outcomes. Most published data come from small case series and case reports. (3-7) The majority of patients in these studies had early stage disease (stage IA-IIA) at the time of diagnosis and during pregnancy. Most patients did not have progression of their disease during pregnancy and the postpartum period. (3,4) However, a few studies described patients with both early and advanced stage disease who developed flares during pregnancy that were attributed to treatment discontinuation and the immunosuppressive effects of pregnancy. (4-8)
One report described a patient with stage IIIA (erythrodermic) CTCL who was treated with PUVA and interferon, but discontinued all treatment once she became pregnant. One week following delivery, she presented with erythroderma with lymphadenopathy and biopsies demonstrating CD30+ large cell transformation, a histologic feature that is associated with progression of disease. (8) Additionally, Guitart et al described a patient with stable stage IA disease who rapidly progressed to stage IB disease following discontinuation of interferon alpha-2b during her pregnancy. During her second pregnancy, she continued her interferon alpha-2b therapy and had adequate disease control requiring radiation therapy following delivery to treat new plaques that she developed during pregnancy. (5) It is clear that additional studies are necessary to determine whether the immunosuppressive effects of pregnancy play a significant role in modulating disease in patients with CTCL.
Treatment of CTCL is dictated by stage of disease with the goal of using therapies with the least toxicity. In the non-gravid patient, skin-directed therapy (e.g., phototherapy, topical nitrogen mustard, topical carmustine, topical imiquimod, topical bexarotene or other retinoids) is first-line treatment in early-stage patients. (9) While there are no guidelines for pregnancy-safe treatment options specific for CTCL, there are acceptable skin-directed treatments for pregnant patients including topical steroids and phototherapy. (10)
For more advanced disease or patients failing skin-directed treatment, systemic therapy with oral retinoids (e.g, bexarotene, isotretinoin), interferons, methotrexate, other IV systemic treatments (e.g., mogamulizumab, romidepsin, pralatrexate, brentuximab), and radiation are considered in the non-gravid patient. While most of these therapies are contraindicated in pregnancy or in those considering pregnancy, use of interferon during pregnancy has been described. (5,11) In patients with reproductive potential in whom systemic treatment is being considered, pregnancy testing should be performed and fertility preservation should be discussed. A multi-disciplinary approach with collaboration between dermatology, oncology, neonatology, and obstetrics is important during all stages of disease to ensure treatment optimizes both maternal and fetal outcomes. Timing of treatment is also critically important. Multicenter retrospective studies in the oncology literature indicate that treatment with systemic chemotherapy can have acceptable maternal and fetal outcomes when given after the first trimester. (12)
When Anne finally became pregnant, she had no clinical evidence of disease following many months of treatment with interferon, topical steroids, and phototherapy. She discontinued phototherapy during her first trimester and has opted to stay off treatment. She remains free of disease during her second trimester and plans to re-start phototherapy if her disease flares.
Given the available data, it may be helpful to inform our patients that treatment with topical steroids, phototherapy, and/or interferon during the second and third trimesters are relatively safe treatment options and can be helpful to prevent disease flares and progression of disease during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Clearly, additional studies to define prognosis and identify pregnancy-safe treatment options are needed to prevent a pause in treatment as well as the potential progression of disease.
In conclusion, 1) It is essential to have a multi-disciplinary team involved in the care of patients with pregnancy-associated cutaneous lymphoma to develop goals-of-care that balance maternal and fetal well-being; 2) Fertility preservation should be discussed following diagnosis; 3) Timing of treatment is important in patients with pregnancy associated CTCL and continuing treatment during the second and third trimesters should be considered to prevent disease flares/progression; 4) Additional studies are needed to determine the association between pregnancy and CTCL and to establish guidelines for pregnancy-safe treatment.
Point to Remember: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma during pregnancy presents unique challenges in preventing disease progression and maintaining fetal viability. Many standard therapies used in the non-gravid state are contraindicated; topical steroids, phototherapy, and interferon are considered safe options. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary for optimal management.
Our expert’s viewpoint
Danielle DeHoratius, MD, FAAD
Pregnancy can bring on many cutaneous conditions. Melasma, linea nigra, varicose veins, and striae gravidarum are common examples. Most of them are inconsequential and reminders that the body is undergoing tremendous changes to nourish this growing life. Many of them also tend to improve or resolve once the pregnancy is complete and the baby is born. Unfortunately, there are a handful of diseases attributable to pregnancy that can worsen during the course of the pregnancy, such as pruritic folliculitis of pregnancy, pemphigoid gestationis, prurigo of pregnancy, and intrahepatic cholestasis, to name a few. Pregnancy can certainly be anxiety provoking as can having cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The combination of the two along with the potential for worsening CTCL secondary to pregnancy can make patients even more apprehensive.
Having trained with some of the CTCL greats, Drs. Edelson, Heald, and Girardi, I learned that they would often reassure the patients with early-stage disease that they have a normal life expectancy. This changes with more advanced disease and it also includes disease progression. Dr. Villasenor-Park beautifully describes the essential need for more research on both treatment and potential evolution of disease. Knowledge is power and we need to provide these patients with more understanding of what could lie ahead.
Criscione VD, Weinstock MA. Incidence of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in the United States, 1973-2002. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(7): 854-9.
Wu JH, Cohen BA, Sweren RJ. Mycosis fungoides in pediatric patients: Clinical features, diagnostic challenges, and advances in therapeutic management. Pediatr Dermatol 2020; 37(1): 18-28.
Amitay-Layish I, David M, Kafri B, Barzilai A, Feinmesser M, Hodak E. Early-stage mycosis fungoides, parapsoriasis en plaque, and pregnancy. International Journal of Dermatology 2007; 46(2): 160-5.
Castelo-Branco C, Torné A, Cararach V, Iglesias X. Mycosis fungoides and pregnancy. Oncol Rep 2001; 8(1): 197-206.
LeWitt TM, Walker CJ, Espinosa ML, Chung C, Zhou XA, Guitart J. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and pregnancy: Great uncertainty and an appeal for prospective clinical research. J Am Acad Dermatol 2022; 87(4): 856-8.
Litaiem N, Fazzani M, Zeglaoui F. A need for a clear definition of mycosis fungoides flares to evaluate disease course during pregnancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 89(1): e65-e6.
Naeini FF, Abtahi-naeini B, Najafian J, Saffaei A, Pourazizi M. Correlation between mycosis fungoides and pregnancy. Saudi Medical Journal 2016; 37(9): 968-72.
Naeini F, Najafian J, Nilforoushzadeh M. CD30+ large cell transformation of mycosis fungoides during pregnancy. Indian Journal of Dermatology 2013; 58(2): 160-.
Mehta-Shah N, Horwitz SM, Ansell S, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Primary Cutaneous Lymphomas, Version 2.2020: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18(5): 522-36.
Murase JE, Heller MM, Butler DC. Safety of dermatologic medications in pregnancy and lactation: Part I. Pregnancy. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2014; 70(3): 401.e1-.e14.
Gangat N, Tefferi A. Myeloproliferative neoplasms and pregnancy: Overview and practice recommendations. American Journal of Hematology 2021; 96(3): 354-66.
Pinnix CC, Osborne EM, Chihara D, et al. Maternal and Fetal Outcomes After Therapy for Hodgkin or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Diagnosed During Pregnancy. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2(8): 1065-9.
All content found on Dermatology World Insights and Inquiries, including: text, images, video, audio, or other formats, were created for informational purposes only. The content represents the opinions of the authors and should not be interpreted as the official AAD position on any topic addressed. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
DW Insights and Inquiries archive
Explore hundreds of Dermatology World Insights and Inquiries articles by clinical area, specific condition, or medical journal source.
The American Academy of Dermatology is a non-profit professional organization and does not endorse companies or products. Advertising helps support our mission.
Opportunities
Find a Dermatologist
Member directory
AAD Learning Center
2026 AAD Annual Meeting
Need coding help?
Reduce burdens
Clinical guidelines
Why use AAD measures?
New insights
Physician wellness
Joining or selling a practice?
Promote the specialty
Advocacy priorities